PENGGUNAAN KONSTRUKSI DAN KONSENSUS DALAM KEBENARAN SEJARAH

Authors

  • Nur Fajar Absor Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22236/semnas/11304-310192

Keywords:

Truth, Construction, Consensus, Paradigm

Abstract

This study discusses the use of construction and consensus to seek historical truth. The method used is a qualitative method with the data collection technique is document study or literature study by examining the literature relating to research on construction and consensus in historical truth. The result is construction which is a flow in history is a knowledge of history based on historical evidence, such as documents and inscriptions can be analyzed and compiled about something that might have happened in the past. So that, from this construction can be made a historical writing. Meanwhile, consensus as a truth theory about a theory that is really correct by the community that is related to what is true, in accordance with truth in historical writing also depends on the results of the consensus by historians. The conclusion is to find the truth of research by using construction and consensus to make historians have and always believe with a subjective opinion about the interpretation is the seriousness of the truth that is objective

 

References

Adam, A. W. (2007). Seabad Kontroversi Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Ombak.

Adam, A. W. (2009). Membongkar Manipulasi Sejarah, Kontroversi Pelaku dan Peristiwa. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Ankersmit, F. (1987). Refleksi tentang Sejarah: Pendapat-Pendapat Modern tentang Filsafat Sejarah. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Daliman, A. (2012). Pengantar Filsafat Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Ombak.

Kartodirdjo, S. (1993). Pendekatan Ilmu Sosial dalam Metodologi Sejarah. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kuhn, T. S. (2002). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: Peran Paradigma dalam Revolusi Sains. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Suswandari, S. (2017). Ternate Historical Site as an Object Based Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 151-163.

Suswandari, S. (2010). Paradigma Pendidikan Sejarah dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Masa Depan. Cakrawala Pendidikan, (1), 87171.

Suswandari, S. (2017). Multicultural Approach in Learning as the Attempt of Reinforcing Indonesian Diversity in Elementary School. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 158.

Jumardi, J., & Suswandari, S. (2018). Situs Benteng Fort Rotterdam Sebagai Sumber Belajar Dan Destinasi Pariwisata Kota Makasar: Tinjauan Fisik Arsitektur Dan Kesejarahan. Candrasangkala: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sejarah, 4(2), 134-144.

Suswandari, S. (2017). Ternate Historical Site as an Object Based Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 151-163.

Tamburaka, R. E. (1999). Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah, Teori Filsafat Sejarah, Sejarah Filsafat, dan Iptek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Wiranu, K. U. (2007). Konsensus Nasional dalam Lintas Sejarah Indonesia (1928-1966) Perspektif Rasio Komunikatif Jurgen Habermas. Universitas Indonesia.

Wirawan. (2016). Evaluasi: Teori, Model, Metodologi, Standar, Aplikasi dan Profesi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Zaprulkhan. (2016). Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Analisis Kontemporer. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Zed, M. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Obor

Downloads

Published

2020-08-26

How to Cite

Nur Fajar Absor. (2020). PENGGUNAAN KONSTRUKSI DAN KONSENSUS DALAM KEBENARAN SEJARAH. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Berseri, 1(1), 304–311. https://doi.org/10.22236/semnas/11304-310192