BERBEDAKAH MOTIVASI BERAGAMA KELOMPOK AKSI BELA ISLAM 212 DENGAN KELOMPOK NON AKSI BELA ISLAM 212?

Authors

  • Gessike Putri Ramadani Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA
  • Yulmaida Amir Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA
  • Ilham Mundzir Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22236/semnas/11150-160176

Keywords:

Religious Motivation, 212 Islamic Defending Action Group, non Islamic Defending Action 212

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether the 212 Islamic Defenders Action group has different religious motivations from non-Islamic Defendance Action groups 212. Religious motivation in this case is seen from the religious orientation and internalization of Religion. The religious orientation in question is the tendency regarding the origin of the motives that underlie one's religious behavior. In this case, whether intrinsically oriented (based on religion and the teachings of the religion), or extrinsic oriented (based on individual personal motives, religion as a means to an end). The measuring instrument used is the Religioius Orientation Scale (ROS). Internalization of religion is about the extent to which religious teachings are adopted by individuals as a part of themselves. Measuring instruments use the scale of Religious Internalization. The subjects in this study were 100 people. 50 people from the Islamic Defenders Action group 212 and 50 non-Islamic Defenders Action groups. The results showed that there were differences in religious orientation in the non-Islamic Action Group 212 (p =, 001 <, 05), namely the non-Islamic Action Group 212 non-intrinsically oriented group, while the Islamic Defensive Action group 212 there was no difference between the intricate orientation and extrinsic. The results of the Internalisation of Religion measurement show that in general the internalization or adoption of religion is more seen in the non-Islamic Defendant Action group 212 than the Islamic Defendant Action 212. However, when viewed further from the type of religious internalization the difference is also seen namely: the Islamic Defendant Action Group 212 tends to be more independent in making the value of Religion a part of him. While there is no difference between the level of independence in the Islamic Action Group and the influence of external factors in the process of adopting religious values.

 

References

Amir, Y. (2017). Efek Model Sosialisasi Agama pada Religiusitas. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Psikologi: Kajian Empiris & Non-Empiris, 3(2), 91-97.

Amir, Y., & Lesmawati, D. R. (2016). Religiusitas dan Spiritualitas: Konsep yang Sama atau Berbeda?. Jurnal ilmiah penelitian psikologi: kajian empiris & non-empiris, 2(2), 67-73.

Akhrani, L. A. (2018). Front Pembela Islam: Menggali akar konflik beragama ditinjau dari fanatisme agama, prasangka agama dan intensi konflik. FENOMENA, 27(1).

Aziz Firdaus, M. (2012). Metode Penelitian (Edisi Pertama). Depok: Jelajah Nusa.

Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas edisi 4. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

BPS(Badan Pusat Statistik).2019. STATISTIK INDONESIA 2019 Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2019 yang diakses melalui https://www.bps.go.id/publication/download.html pada tanggal 08 September 2019

D Hendropuspito, O. C. (1983). Sosiologi agama. Kanisius.

Darvyri, P., Galanakis, M., Avgoustidis, A. G., Pateraki, N., Vasdekis, S., & Darviri, C. (2014). The revised intrinsic/extrinsic religious orientation scale in a sample of Attica’s inhabitants. Psychology, 5(13), 1557-1567.

Hoberman, M. (2012). Exploring the Relationship Between Religious Internalization and Mental Health Among Orthodox Jews: A Quantitative Analysis (Doctoral dissertation, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology).

https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20181201121150-20-350369/aksi-212-dari-mulut-ahok-ke-reuni-aroma-pilpres pada tanggal 1 November 2019

Mushtofa, D. R. (2018). Hubungan orientasi religius intrinsik dengan psychological well-being (kesejahteraan psikologis) pada guru honorer sekolah dasar di Kecamatan Taman Kabupaten Pemalang (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Walisongo).

Narbuko, C., & Achmadi, A. (1997). Metodologi Penelitian. cetakan pertama. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Portal Informasi Indonesia. 2019. Yang diakses melalui https://www.indonesia.go.id/profil/agama pada tanggal 08 September 2019

Rosmiyati, D. (2002). Perbedaan Harga Diri ditinjau Dari Orientasi Religiusitas Ekstrinsik-Intrinsik.

Rozi, F., & Amir, Y. (2018). RELIGIOUS SOCIALIZATION AND RELIGIOSITY. In Prosiding Kolokium Doktor dan Seminar Hasil Penelitian Hibah (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 131-143).

Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(5), 749.

Ryan, R. M., Rigby, S., & King, K. (1993). Two types of religious internalization and their relations to religious orientations and mental health. Journal of personality and social psychology, 65(3), 586

Seniati, L., Yulianto, A., & Setiadi, B. N. (2005). Psikologi eksperimen. Jakarta: PT Indeks. .

Siregar. (2016). Statistika Deskriptif untuk penelitian. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada

Suciana, I. (2016). Hubungan orientasi religius intrinsik dengan psychological well-being (kesejahteraan psikologis) pada guru honorer sekolah dasar di Kecamatan Taman Kabupaten Pemalang (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Walisongo).

Tsang, J. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Measuring religious constructs: A hierarchical approach to construct organization and scale selection.

Wahidin, A. (2017). KONSEP ULAMA MENURUT AL-QUR'AN (Studi Analitis atas Surat Fathir Ayat 28). Al-Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir, 1(01).

Wibisono, S., & Taufik, M. (2017). Orientasi Keberagamaan Ekstrinsik dan Fundamentalisme Agama pada Mahasiswa Muslim: Analisis dengan Model Rasch. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, 15(1), 1-11.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-23

How to Cite

Gessike Putri Ramadani, Yulmaida Amir, & Ilham Mundzir. (2020). BERBEDAKAH MOTIVASI BERAGAMA KELOMPOK AKSI BELA ISLAM 212 DENGAN KELOMPOK NON AKSI BELA ISLAM 212?. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Berseri, 1(1), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.22236/semnas/11150-160176