EVALUASI PROGRAM SIARAN PENDIDIKAN INTERAKTIF TELEVISI EDUKASI MATA PELAJARAN IPA
Keywords:
program evaluation, Stake's Countenance evaluation model, Televisi Edukasi (TVE), Pustekkom, science education programAbstract
The purpose of this study is to explain the effectiveness of the interactive education broadcastprograms for science. The program is broadcast by Pustekkom on its Televisi Edukasi
channel ahead of the National Exam. The study uses the Countenance evaluation model
developed by Stake. The study is carried out in three steps: evaluating the antecedents,
transactions and outcomes. The study found that 89,47% of the antecedent and 84.61% of the
transactions aspects of the program meet the evaluation standard, while only 66,67% of the
outcomes aspects do. While this program has a good preparation and implementation, it is
yet to provide an optimum benefit for students. An analysis of this study concludes that while
the program is in line with the ongoing curriculum, and despite students‟ high interest, it is
yet to accommodate students‟ needs or give maximum contribution due to lack of promotion
and access to broadcasting schedule with some colliding with students‟ study time. I
recommend maintaining the program and making improvements: providing reruns,
increasing the broadcast frequency by broadcasting on national TV channels, Facebook fan
page, TVE‟s website or by distributing booklets. I also recommend replacing or training
mentors so that they master the subject they teach. I recommend that the program refrain
from using very formal or stiff language.
References
Ames, Maurice U. (1959). Teaching science by television. The Clearing House, 34, 38.
Arikunto, & Jabar, A. (2007). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi
Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Bonsall, Wood. (2001). Stake‘s countenance model: evaluating an environmental education
professional development course. The Journal of Enviromental Education, 32, 18-27.
Djaali dan Puji Mulyono, Pengukuran dan Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Grasindo, 2008.
Fitzpatrick, J.L., Sanders, J.R., &Worthen, B.R. (2004). Program Evaluation. Alternative
Approaches and Practical Guidelines. Boston: Pearson Education.
Indriana, D. (2011).Ragam Alat Bantu Media Pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Diva press.
Jacob, J.N. (1960). Teaching seventh grade mathematics by television. The Mathematics
Teacher, 53, 543-547.
Kirkpatrick, Donald L & Kirkpatrick,James D. (2005). Evaluating Training
Programs: The Four Level. San Fransisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Knowles, A.S. (1958). TV and science. The High School Jounal, 41, 180-185.
McDavid, J.C., & Hawthorn, L.R.L. (2006). Program Evaluation and Performance
Measurement: An Introduction to Practice. California: Sage Publications.
Poulter, M.W. (1956). Television and Education. The Australian Quarterly, 28, 95.
Pusat Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Pendidikan. (2007). Sekilas Pustekkom, TVE, e
dukasi, net,dan PJJ. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Pustekkom.
Pustekkom. Katalog Program TV Edukasi & Suara Edukasi. Jakarta: Pusat Teknologi
Informasi dan Komunikasi Pendidikan, 2014.
Stake, Robert E. The Countenance of Educational Evaluation. http:// education. illinois.
edu/circe/ Publications/Countenance.pdf (diakses 17 Januari 2012).
Stufflebeam, D.L. & Shinfield, A.J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models and Applications.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sudirman, S., Waldopo. dan Oos M. Anwas. (2006). Televisi Pendidikan di Era Global.
Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Pusat Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi
Pendidikan.
Sukardi, Evaluasi Pendidikan: Prinsip dan Operasionalnya, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2009
Suryadi, D., & Kudwadi, B. (2010). ―Application of Evaluation Model Countenance In the
Secondary Education Curriculum and Vocational technology:. Proceedings of the 1‟st
UPI international Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training.
Bandung.
Tayibnapis, F.Y. (2008). Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi untuk
ProgramPendidikan dan Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Widoyoko, S.E.P. (2009).Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran: Panduan Praktis bagi
Pendidik dan Calon Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajan.
